Supreme Court Dismisses Texas Election Lawsuit

The Supreme Court dismissed the Texas election lawsuit that seventeen states and 120 House Republicans joined.
Supreme Court Dismisses Texas Election Lawsuit

Trump’s team has had their eyes on the Supreme Court for a while now. In recent days, seventeen states and 120 House Republicans have joined a suit filed against swing states claiming they made changes to voting rules through the courts instead of state legislatures. After much anticipation, the highest court has decided to reject the motion due to a lack of standing.

Supreme Court Order to Texas by Breitbart News

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton filed a case directly to the Supreme Court, challenging the Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan, and Wisconsin election results.

The Case

The suit argued that the four states illegally made changes to the voting rules through the courts instead of through state legislatures, violating the Electors Clause. It also argues the differences in voting rules in different counties violated the Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and cites claims of voting irregularities in each state.

“The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution,” the statement from the Supreme Court read. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections.”

President Trump repeatedly referred to the Texas case as “The big one” and also urged the Supreme Court justices to have the “wisdom” and the “courage” to take up the case.

Justice Samuel Alito issued a statement with the dismissal joined by Justice Clarence Thomas, arguing that the Supreme Court should take up the case. “In my view, we do not have the discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction,” Alito wrote, arguing that he would grant the motion to file the bill of complaint.

But Alito signaled he would not have granted the state of Texas the ability to halt the election certification as the challenge requested. “I would therefore grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue,” he concluded.

All three justices appointed by Trump, Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh, and Neil Gorsuch, did not voice an opinion on the case.

Sharing our articles helps AFLOE survive and thrive. Thank you for reading.

Join the AFLOE newsletter for breaking news and events!

Americans For Logic Over Emotions

We hope you enjoy this article. If you do, don't hesitate to share it as it helps us grow. Thank you!

About Us

Our mission is to expose many of the misconceptions that are spread around left-wing media. We believe in high quality and relevant content. While we understand emotions are important, we believe logic and facts should be the main factor used to determine policy.
Learn More

New Videos

YouTube Channel

Subscribe to AFLOE Politics official YouTube channel for more videos. YouTube is where we will be producing our highest quality content.
Share this
Send this to a friend